Japan Pickleball Association Launches First National Rankings
What's the Score?
In a historic move for Asian pickleball, the Japan Pickleball Association (JPA) has released its first-ever official national rankings, dated January 2026. This initiative aims to visualise and formalize competitive performance across the country, aggregating points from authorised tournaments to create a unified hierarchy of players. The release covers a wide range of age and gender categories, marking a significant step toward the professionalisation of the sport in Japan.
Hit it deeper!
The JPA's new ranking system is designed to provide transparency and motivation for the country's growing player base. The January 2026 release includes rankings for Men’s and Women’s Singles and Doubles, as well as Mixed Doubles, separated into 19+, 35+, and 50+ age brackets. This broad categorisation ensures that players of all demographics are recognised for their achievements.
However, the launch also reveals where the sport is still developing. The association noted that rankings for "Women's Singles 35+" were not released due to a lack of match history in that specific category. Additionally, the "Mixed Doubles 35+" rankings are currently being tallied and will be announced at a later date. Despite these gaps, the JPA has published detailed PDF documents for all other categories, establishing a baseline for future competition.
The association describes the rankings as an initiative to "visualize the performance of competitions in Japan," encouraging athletes and fans to keep a close eye on how the standings evolve as more authorised tournaments take place throughout the year.
The World Pickleball Verdict
The establishment of a national ranking system by the JPA is a critical infrastructure development for pickleball in Japan. Without official rankings, a sport remains a recreational pastime; with them, it becomes a structured competitive pursuit. This move mirrors the early steps taken by organisations in the US and Europe to legitimise the sport.
The missing data in specific categories like Women’s 35+ Singles is not a failure but a roadmap—it highlights exactly where growth is needed. As these rankings gain traction, they will likely spur increased participation in under-represented divisions. Ultimately, this transparency will foster a higher level of competition, helping Japanese players measure themselves against domestic rivals and, eventually, international standards.